Home/Court of Appeals of Oregon/State v. Hardwick

State v. Hardwick

871 P.2d 506, 127 Or. App. 134, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 373
CourtCourt of Appeals of Oregon
DecidedMarch 23, 1994
DocketM92-1170; CA A79380
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 871 P.2d 506 (State v. Hardwick) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hardwick, 871 P.2d 506, 127 Or. App. 134, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 373 (Or. Ct. App. 1994).

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant and his wife both pleaded guilty to criminal trespass. ORS 164.245. After a joint sentencing hearing, the trial court suspended imposition of sentence and placed defendant and his wife on probation. It also ordered that defendant and his wife were jointly and severally liable to pay $2,000 in restitution to the victim. That sentence exceeded the maximum allowable by law, because the state failed to present any evidence that the victim suffered pecuniary damages. State v. Hardwick (A79379), 127 Or App 132, 871 P2d 505 (1994).

Conviction affirmed; order of restitution vacated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Hardwick
871 P.2d 505 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1994)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
871 P.2d 506, 127 Or. App. 134, 1994 Ore. App. LEXIS 373, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hardwick-orctapp-1994.