State v. Hardoby
Opinion
Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000514 03-JUN-2015 08:22 AM
SCWC-12-0000514
IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII
STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,
vs.
STACY E. HARDOBY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant.
CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000514; CASE NO. 2DTC-11-014020)
ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)
Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stacy E. Hardoby’s application for writ of certiorari filed on May 12, 2015, is hereby accepted.
IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument.
DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, June 3, 2015.
James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama
Artemio C. Baxa for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna
/s/ Richard W. Pollack
/s/ Michael D. Wilson
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hardoby (State v. Hardoby) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.