State v. Hardoby

Hawaii Supreme Court

State v. Hardoby

DecidedJune 3, 2015

DocketSCWC-12-0000514

StatusPublished

This text of State v. Hardoby (State v. Hardoby) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Hawaii Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hardoby, (haw 2015).

Pincite

Opinion

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000514 03-JUN-2015 08:22 AM SCWC-12-0000514

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STACY E. HARDOBY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000514; CASE NO. 2DTC-11-014020)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stacy E. Hardoby’s application for writ of certiorari filed on May 12, 2015, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, June 3, 2015. James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Artemio C. Baxa for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Electronically Filed Supreme Court SCWC-12-0000514 03-JUN-2015 08:22 AM SCWC-12-0000514

IN THE SUPREME COURT OF THE STATE OF HAWAII ________________________________________________________________

STATE OF HAWAII, Respondent/Plaintiff-Appellee,

vs.

STACY E. HARDOBY, Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant. ________________________________________________________________

CERTIORARI TO THE INTERMEDIATE COURT OF APPEALS (CAAP-12-0000514; CASE NO. 2DTC-11-014020)

ORDER ACCEPTING APPLICATION FOR WRIT OF CERTIORARI (By: Recktenwald, C.J., Nakayama, McKenna, Pollack, and Wilson, JJ.)

Petitioner/Defendant-Appellant Stacy E. Hardoby’s application for writ of certiorari filed on May 12, 2015, is hereby accepted. IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that no oral argument will be heard in this case. Any party may, within ten days and pursuant to Rule 34(c) of the Hawaii Rules of Appellate Procedure, move for retention of oral argument. DATED: Honolulu, Hawaii, June 3, 2015. James S. Tabe /s/ Mark E. Recktenwald for petitioner /s/ Paula A. Nakayama Artemio C. Baxa for respondent /s/ Sabrina S. McKenna

/s/ Richard W. Pollack

/s/ Michael D. Wilson

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

State v. Hardoby, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hardoby-haw-2015.