State v. Handspike
This text of 240 S.E.2d 1 (State v. Handspike) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinions
The question in this certiorari appeal is whether the Court of Appeals erred as a matter of law in determining that the search and seizure of less than an ounce of marijuana on the defendant’s person was not a lawful search incident to an arrest. Under the facts recited in the Court of Appeals’ opinion, the policeman had probable cause to arrest Handspike when he recognized the two girls in the car as juveniles, saw the wine and cups, and was told by the defendant that he had given the girls some wine. Code Ann. § 58-612. We hold that the officer had observed a crime being committed in his presence and had probable cause to arrest the defendant. He conducted his search incident to that arrest, and the marijuana was properly seized. Code Ann. § 27-207, Mitchell v. State, 136 Ga. App. 658 (222 SE2d 160) (1975). We therefore reverse the Court of Appeals opinion in State v. Handspike, 142 Ga. App. 104 (235 SE2d 568) (1977).
Judgment reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
240 S.E.2d 1, 240 Ga. 176, 1977 Ga. LEXIS 1438, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-handspike-ga-1977.