State v. Hamm

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hamm

294 S.W.3d 127, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 2009 WL 3188697

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedOctober 6, 2009

DocketED 91946

StatusPublished

This text of 294 S.W.3d 127 (State v. Hamm) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Hamm, 294 S.W.3d 127, 2009 Mo. App. LEXIS 1413, 2009 WL 3188697 (Mo. Ct. App. 2009).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Gary Hamm (Defendant) appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury convicted him of second-degree trafficking, possession of drug paraphernalia, and driving with a revoked license. Defendant argues that the trial court erred by overruling his motion for a mistrial after a State’s witness testified about Defendant’s post -Miranda silence. Finding no error, we affirm.

*128 We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the trial court did not err. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI