State v. Hamm
224 S.W.3d 605, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1959, 2006 WL 3770783
Opinion
ORDER
Sharon Hamm appeals from her conviction for driving while intoxicated, a violation of Section 577.010, RSMo 2000. Upon review of the briefs and the record, we find sufficient evidence to support the conviction and, therefore, affirm the judgment. Because a published opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we have provided the parties with a Memorandum explaining the reasons for our decision.
AFFIRMED. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Hamm, 224 S.W.3d 605, 2006 Mo. App. LEXIS 1959, 2006 WL 3770783 (Mo. Ct. App. 2006).
224 S.W.3d 605 (State v. Hamm) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
Manager of the Division of Finance of Jackson County v. La-Sha Consulting, Inc.
224 S.W.3d 605 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2006)