State v. Hamilton

Ohio Supreme Court

State v. Hamilton

936 N.E.2d 960, 127 Ohio St. 3d 120

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided November 2, 2010·No. Nos. 2009-1878 and 2009-1958·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Horner, 126 Ohio St.3d 466. 2010-Ohio-3830, 935 N.E.2d 26.

Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten A. Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Craig M. Jaquith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

{¶ 1} The certified question is answered in the affirmative and the judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Horner, 126 Ohio St.3d 466. 2010-Ohio-3830, 935 N.E.2d 26.

Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Kirsten A. Brandt, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellant. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Craig M. Jaquith, Assistant Public Defender, for appellee. Brown, C.J., and Pfeifer, Lundberg Stratton, O’Connor, O’Donnell, and Cupp, JJ., concur. Lanzinger, J., dissents.

State v. Hamilton, 936 N.E.2d 960, 127 Ohio St. 3d 120 (Ohio 2010).

Pincite

936 N.E.2d 960 (State v. Hamilton) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related