Home/Ohio Supreme Court/State v. Hamilton

State v. Hamilton

919 N.E.2d 213, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1413
CourtOhio Supreme Court
DecidedDecember 30, 2009
Docket2009-1958
StatusPublished

This text of 919 N.E.2d 213 (State v. Hamilton) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Hamilton, 919 N.E.2d 213, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1413 (Ohio 2009).

Opinion

Montgomery App. No. 22895, 2009-Ohio-4602. On review of order certifying a conflict. The court determines that a conflict exists. The parties are to brief the issue stated at page 3 of the court of appeals’ Decision and Entry filed October 18, 2009:

“May an indictment which does not contain all the elements of an offense be amended to include an [1414]*1414omitted mens rea element that was not presented to the grand jury?”

The conflict case is State v. Rice, Hamilton App. No. C-080444, 2009-Ohio-1080.

Sua sponte, cause consolidated with 2009-1878, State v. Hamilton, Montgomery App. No. 22895, 2009-Ohio-4602.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Rice, C-080444 (3-13-2009)
2009 Ohio 1080 (Ohio Court of Appeals, 2009)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
919 N.E.2d 213, 124 Ohio St. 3d 1413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-hamilton-ohio-2009.