State v. Hall

476 P.2d 930, 4 Or. App. 28, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 391
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided November 16, 1970·No. C-46075·Published·Cited by 3 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM

Defendant appeals from an order revoking probation. The only question presented is whether a subsequent conviction is grounds for probation revocation even though an appeal from that subsequent conviction is pending. This issue has been decided in the affirmative by State v. Spicer, 3 Or App 80, 471 P2d 865 (1970).

Furthermore, in this case the question is moot because the subsequent conviction which gave rise, at least in part, to the probation revocation was today affirmed by this court. See State v. Hall, 4 Or App 30, 476 P2d 930 (1970).

Affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Hall, 476 P.2d 930, 4 Or. App. 28, 1970 Ore. App. LEXIS 391 (Or. Ct. App. 1970).

476 P.2d 930 (State v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Serrano
544 P.2d 101 (Court of Appeals of Washington, 1975)
State v. Roberson
327 A.2d 556 (Supreme Court of Connecticut, 1973)
State v. Phillips
481 P.2d 381 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1971)