State v. Hall

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hall

901 S.W.2d 352, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1241, 1995 WL 392004

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hall. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1943 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided June 30, 1995·No. No. 66344·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon in violation of § 571.030.1(1) RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to four years imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth our reasoning. [353]*353The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals the judgment following his conviction by a jury of unlawful use of a weapon in violation of § 571.030.1(1) RSMo 1994. Defendant was sentenced to four years imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. An opinion reciting the detañed facts and restating the principles of law would have no precedential value. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only setting forth our reasoning. [353]*353The judgment is affirmed in accordance with Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Hall, 901 S.W.2d 352, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1241, 1995 WL 392004 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

901 S.W.2d 352 (State v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.