State v. Hall

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Hall

877 S.W.2d 138, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 720, 1994 WL 160365

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Hall. Read the opinion of the Court — 1993 Mo. App. LEXIS 1943 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 3, 1994·No. Nos. 61560, 64506·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a short barreled shotgun and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. Further, we find neither a jurisprudential purpose nor a precedential purpose would be served by a written, opinion and we affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b); 30.25(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Judgments affirmed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals his conviction for possession of a short barreled shotgun and the denial of his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief. We affirm. Further, we find neither a jurisprudential purpose nor a precedential purpose would be served by a written, opinion and we affirm by summary order. Rule 84.16(b); 30.25(b). A memorandum has been provided to the parties for their use only.

Judgments affirmed.

State v. Hall, 877 S.W.2d 138, 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 720, 1994 WL 160365 (Mo. Ct. App. 1994).

Pincite

877 S.W.2d 138 (State v. Hall) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.