State v. HALKMAN

322 S.W.3d 160, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1311, 2010 WL 3760255
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 2010·No. ED 93996·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ronald Halkman appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of first-degree murder, first-degree robbery, and two counts of armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court committed no reversible error. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. HALKMAN, 322 S.W.3d 160, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1311, 2010 WL 3760255 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

322 S.W.3d 160 (State v. HALKMAN) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

DIBERT v. Allen
322 S.W.3d 160 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)