DIBERT v. Allen

322 S.W.3d 160, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1310, 2010 WL 3760257
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided September 28, 2010·No. ED 93920·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Jedediah Dibert (“Father”) appeals the trial court’s amended judgment modifying an earlier judgment and order establishing paternity, custody and child support. He claims one point on appeal. Father alleges that the trial court erred in rejecting his proposed parenting plan and custody order and adopting one in which Layla Allen (“Mother”) retained primary residential custody of the minor child.

No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the principles of law. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion for their information only, which sets forth the facts and reasons for this order.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

DIBERT v. Allen, 322 S.W.3d 160, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 1310, 2010 WL 3760257 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

322 S.W.3d 160 (DIBERT v. Allen) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. HALKMAN
322 S.W.3d 160 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)