State v. Haik

Supreme Court of Louisiana

State v. Haik

242 So. 2d 884, 257 La. 543, 1971 La. LEXIS 4616

CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana

DecidedJanuary 21, 1971

DocketNo. 51126

StatusPublished

This text of 242 So. 2d 884 (State v. Haik) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Haik, 242 So. 2d 884, 257 La. 543, 1971 La. LEXIS 4616 (La. 1971).

Pincite

Opinions

The petition of -the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Judges, Appellate Division No. 2, Judge of the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 1st day of April, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through the District Attorney ad hoc shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The petition of -the relator in the above entitled and numbered case having been duly considered,

It is ordered that a writ of certiorari issue herein, directing the Honorable Judges, Appellate Division No. 2, Judge of the Criminal District Court, Parish of Orleans, to transmit to the Supreme Court of Louisiana, on or before the 1st day of April, 1971, the record in duplicate, or a certified copy of the record in duplicate, of the proceedings complained of by the relator herein, to the end that the validity of said proceedings may be ascertained.

It is further ordered that the aforesaid Judge of said Court and the respondent through the District Attorney ad hoc shall show cause, in this court, on the date aforesaid, at 11 o’clock A.M., why the relief prayed for in the petition of the relator should not be granted.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

242 So. 2d 884, 257 La. 543, 1971 La. LEXIS 4616, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-haik-la-1971.

Opinions

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack