State v. DeBate

242 So. 2d 246, 257 La. 272, 1971 La. LEXIS 4579
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided January 5, 1971·No. No. 51050·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should not be considered. See reasons assigned, in State v. Normand, No. 51,049 on the docket of this Court, 257 La. 270, 242 So.2d 245.

TATE, J., concurs in BARHAM, J.’s reasons for not considering the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. DeBate, 242 So. 2d 246, 257 La. 272, 1971 La. LEXIS 4579 (La. 1971).

242 So. 2d 246 (State v. DeBate) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Haik
242 So. 2d 884 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)