State v. DeBate

242 So. 2d 246, 257 La. 272, 1971 La. LEXIS 4579
CourtSupreme Court of Louisiana
DecidedJanuary 5, 1971
DocketNo. 51050
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 242 So. 2d 246 (State v. DeBate) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Louisiana primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. DeBate, 242 So. 2d 246, 257 La. 272, 1971 La. LEXIS 4579 (La. 1971).

Opinion

BARHAM, J.,

is of the opinion the writ should not be considered. See reasons assigned, in State v. Normand, No. 51,049 on the docket of this Court, 257 La. 270, 242 So.2d 245.

TATE, J., concurs in BARHAM, J.’s reasons for not considering the application.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Haik
242 So. 2d 884 (Supreme Court of Louisiana, 1971)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
242 So. 2d 246, 257 La. 272, 1971 La. LEXIS 4579, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-debate-la-1971.