State v. HAIDUL
334 S.W.3d 920, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 397, 2011 WL 1004681
Opinion
ORDER
John Haidul appeals from the trial court’s judgment and sentence after a jury found him guilty of first degree robbery. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. HAIDUL, 334 S.W.3d 920, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 397, 2011 WL 1004681 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
334 S.W.3d 920 (State v. HAIDUL) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
John T. Haidul v. State of Missouri
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014
Haidul v. State
425 S.W.3d 148 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2014)
Short v. State
334 S.W.3d 920 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)