Short v. State
334 S.W.3d 920, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 371, 2011 WL 1004687
Opinion
ORDER
Kyle Short appeals the motion court’s denial of his 29.15 motion for postconviction relief. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error of- law. No jurisprudential *921 purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Short v. State, 334 S.W.3d 920, 2011 Mo. App. LEXIS 371, 2011 WL 1004687 (Mo. Ct. App. 2011).
334 S.W.3d 920 (Short v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. HAIDUL
334 S.W.3d 920 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2011)