State v. Grocery Mfrs. Ass'n

Washington Supreme Court

State v. Grocery Mfrs. Ass'n

438 P.3d 130, 193 Wash. 2d 1001

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Grocery Mfrs. Ass'n. Read the opinion of the Court — 195 Wash. 2d 442 →

Washington Supreme Court·Decided April 3, 2019·No. No. 96604-4·Published

Opinion

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That both petitions for review are granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

¶1 Department II of the Court, composed of Chief Justice Fairhurst and Justices Madsen, Stephens, González and Yu, considered at its April 2, 2019, Motion Calendar whether review should be granted pursuant to RAP 13.4(b) and unanimously agreed that the following order be entered.

¶2 IT IS ORDERED:

¶3 That both petitions for review are granted. Any party may serve and file a supplemental brief within 30 days of the date of this order, see RAP 13.7(d).

For the Court

/s/ Fairhurst, C.J. CHIEF JUSTICE

State v. Grocery Mfrs. Ass'n, 438 P.3d 130, 193 Wash. 2d 1001 (Wash. 2019).

Pincite

438 P.3d 130 (State v. Grocery Mfrs. Ass'n) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.