State v. Grissom

423 S.W.3d 330, 2014 WL 840060, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 228
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedMarch 4, 2014
DocketNo. ED 99406
StatusPublished
Cited by2 cases

This text of 423 S.W.3d 330 (State v. Grissom) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Grissom, 423 S.W.3d 330, 2014 WL 840060, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 228 (Mo. Ct. App. 2014).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Ladon T. Grissom appeals his jury trial convictions of first-degree assault, two counts of second-degree murder, and three counts of armed criminal action. On appeal, he contends that: 1) the State elicited improper character evidence; 2) the trial court erred in denying his Batson challenge; and 3) the trial court improperly sentenced him to life terms on his armed criminal action conviction contrary to § 571.015.1 RSMo (Supp.2011). We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the claims of error to be without merit. No error of law appears. An extended opinion would have no jurisprudential purpose. We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion only for the use of the parties setting forth the reasons for our decision.

We affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State of Missouri v. John M. Hamm
Missouri Court of Appeals, 2023
Grissom v. State
537 S.W.3d 413 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2018)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
423 S.W.3d 330, 2014 WL 840060, 2014 Mo. App. LEXIS 228, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grissom-moctapp-2014.