Grissom v. State
This text of 537 S.W.3d 413 (Grissom v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
LaDon Grissom (“Movant”) appeals from the motion court’s denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction relief motion following an evidentiary hearing. After a jury trial, Movant was convicted of two counts of murder in the second degree, assault in the first degree, and three counts of armed criminal action. This Court affirmed Mov-ant’s convictions and sentences. State v. Grissom, 423 S.W.3d 330 (Mo. App. E.D. 2014). We have reviewed the briefs of the parties' and the record on appeal and find no error of law. No jurisprudential purpose would be served by a written opinion. However, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum for their information only, setting forth the facts and reasons for this order.
The judgment is affirmed pursuant to Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
537 S.W.3d 413, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/grissom-v-state-moctapp-2018.