State v. Griffin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Griffin

918 S.W.2d 348, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1996 WL 131844

Procedural entryThis page is a short order in State v. Griffin. Read the opinion of the Court — 1994 Mo. App. LEXIS 814 →

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided March 26, 1996·No. No. WD 51297·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Rodney L. Griffin appeals his conviction of driving while intoxicated in violation of Section 577.010, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 30.25(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM:

Defendant Rodney L. Griffin appeals his conviction of driving while intoxicated in violation of Section 577.010, RSMo 1994. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find no error. Because a published opinion reciting the detailed facts and restating the applicable principles of law would have no precedential value, we affirm by this summary order under Rule 30.25(b). In addition, the parties have been furnished with a memorandum opinion, for their information only, setting forth our reasoning.

Judgment affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).

State v. Griffin, 918 S.W.2d 348, 1996 Mo. App. LEXIS 471, 1996 WL 131844 (Mo. Ct. App. 1996).

Pincite

918 S.W.2d 348 (State v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.