State v. Griffin

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Griffin

899 S.W.2d 150, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1025, 1995 WL 319211

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided May 30, 1995·No. Nos. 64537, 66016·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of assault first degree and armed criminal action and his sentence by the court as a prior, persistent, and class X offender to thirty years and ten years imprisonment respectively to be served consecutively. He also appeals from denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. No error of law appears and the verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence. The judgment of the court on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential nor jurisprudential value.

Judgments affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

MEMORANDUM OPINION

PER CURIAM.

Defendant appeals from his conviction by a jury of assault first degree and armed criminal action and his sentence by the court as a prior, persistent, and class X offender to thirty years and ten years imprisonment respectively to be served consecutively. He also appeals from denial of his Rule 29.15 post-conviction motion. No error of law appears and the verdict of the jury is supported by the evidence. The judgment of the court on the Rule 29.15 motion is based on findings of fact that are not clearly erroneous. An opinion would have no precedential nor jurisprudential value.

Judgments affirmed. Rules 30.25(b) and 84.16(b).

State v. Griffin, 899 S.W.2d 150, 1995 Mo. App. LEXIS 1025, 1995 WL 319211 (Mo. Ct. App. 1995).

Pincite

899 S.W.2d 150 (State v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related