Home/District Court of Appeal of Florida/State v. Griffin

State v. Griffin

271 So. 3d 128
District Court of Appeal of Florida·Decided March 13, 2019·No. No. 3D14-2460·Published

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Born-Suniaga v. State, 256 So.3d 783, 786 (Fla. 2018) (holding that the State is not entitled to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)'s recapture period when the State terminates prosecution and files new charges based on the same conduct before speedy trial period expires, but fails to notify the defendant of new charges until after expiration of speedy trial period).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Griffin, 271 So. 3d 128 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

271 So. 3d 128 (State v. Griffin) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Luis Born-Suniaga v. State of Florida
256 So. 3d 783 (Supreme Court of Florida, 2018)