State v. Griffin

District Court of Appeal of Florida

State v. Griffin

271 So. 3d 128

CourtDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida

DecidedMarch 13, 2019

DocketNo. 3D14-2460

StatusPublished

This text of 271 So. 3d 128 (State v. Griffin) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering District Court of Appeal of Florida primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Griffin, 271 So. 3d 128 (Fla. Ct. App. 2019).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Born-Suniaga v. State, 256 So.3d 783, 786 (Fla. 2018) (holding that the State is not entitled to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)'s recapture period when the State terminates prosecution and files new charges based on the same conduct before speedy trial period expires, but fails to notify the defendant of new charges until after expiration of speedy trial period).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Affirmed. See Born-Suniaga v. State, 256 So.3d 783, 786 (Fla. 2018) (holding that the State is not entitled to Florida Rule of Criminal Procedure 3.191(p)'s recapture period when the State terminates prosecution and files new charges based on the same conduct before speedy trial period expires, but fails to notify the defendant of new charges until after expiration of speedy trial period).

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

271 So. 3d 128, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-griffin-fladistctapp-2019.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack