State v. Grenier

Supreme Court of Rhode Island

State v. Grenier

299 A.2d 181, 111 R.I. 905, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 1293

CourtSupreme Court of Rhode Island

DecidedJanuary 30, 1973

DocketEx. No. 1798

StatusPublished

This text of 299 A.2d 181 (State v. Grenier) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Rhode Island primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Grenier, 299 A.2d 181, 111 R.I. 905, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 1293 (R.I. 1973).

Pincite

Opinion

Instant motion for bail pending appeal is denied without prejudice and it together with the papers in the case are herewith ordered transmitted to the Superior Court with direction that it consider the motion for bail as if originally filed therein, and that it forthwith hold a bail hearing thereon for the purpose of determining whether petitioner, under the guidelines enunciated in Quattrocchi v. Langlois, 100 R. I. 741, 219 A.2d 570 (1966) is entitled to be admitted to bail pending hearing on his appeal.

The motion was filed by petitioner pro se although he was formally represented by counsel. In the circumstances, it is deemed advisable to direct Charles J. Rogers, Jr., co-counsel of record, to represent the petitioner in the further prosecution of [906]*906the motion and bail hearing in the Superior Court.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff-respondent. Pierre Grenier, defendant-petitioner, pro se.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Instant motion for bail pending appeal is denied without prejudice and it together with the papers in the case are herewith ordered transmitted to the Superior Court with direction that it consider the motion for bail as if originally filed therein, and that it forthwith hold a bail hearing thereon for the purpose of determining whether petitioner, under the guidelines enunciated in Quattrocchi v. Langlois, 100 R. I. 741, 219 A.2d 570 (1966) is entitled to be admitted to bail pending hearing on his appeal.

The motion was filed by petitioner pro se although he was formally represented by counsel. In the circumstances, it is deemed advisable to direct Charles J. Rogers, Jr., co-counsel of record, to represent the petitioner in the further prosecution of [906]*906the motion and bail hearing in the Superior Court.

Richard J. Israel, Attorney General, Donald P. Ryan, Asst. Attorney General, for plaintiff-respondent. Pierre Grenier, defendant-petitioner, pro se.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

299 A.2d 181, 111 R.I. 905, 1973 R.I. LEXIS 1293, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-grenier-ri-1973.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack