State v. Greff
This text of 2022 ND 143 (State v. Greff) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering North Dakota Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
FILED IN THE OFFICE OF THE CLERK OF SUPREME COURT JULY 21, 2022 STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
IN THE SUPREME COURT STATE OF NORTH DAKOTA
2022 ND 143
State of North Dakota, Plaintiff and Appellee v. Benjamin David Greff, Defendant and Appellant
No. 20220059
Appeal from the District Court of Burleigh County, South Central Judicial District, the Honorable Pamela A. Nesvig, Judge.
AFFIRMED.
Per Curiam.
Justin J. Schwarz, Assistant State’s Attorney, Bismarck, ND, for plaintiff and appellee; submitted on brief.
Steven Balaban, Bismarck, ND, for defendant and appellant; submitted on brief. State v. Greff No. 20220059
[¶1] Benjamin Greff appeals from an amended order deferring imposition of sentence after he pled guilty to theft of property and was ordered to pay restitution. Greff argues the district court acted beyond statutory limits in setting the restitution amount at $5,075 based on the testimony of the co-owner of the stolen property. We conclude the district court acted within statutory limits in setting the amount of restitution. State v. Pagenkopf, 2020 ND 33, ¶ 6, 939 N.W.2d 2 (“When reviewing a restitution order, we look to whether the district court acted within the limits set by statute, which is a standard similar to our abuse of discretion standard.”). We affirm under N.D.R.App.P. 35.1(a)(2).
[¶2] Jon J. Jensen, C.J. Gerald W. VandeWalle Daniel J. Crothers Lisa Fair McEvers Jerod E. Tufte
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2022 ND 143, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-greff-nd-2022.