State v. Green

616 So. 2d 1262, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 4353, 1992 WL 471501
Louisiana Court of Appeal·Decided November 19, 1992·No. No. K92-1376·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Applying for Certiorari, or writ of review, to the 9th Judicial District Court, Parish of Rapides # 215,011 Judge Alfred Mansour.

WRIT DENIED: La.C.Cr.P. art. 930.8, which establishes time limits for filing post-conviction relief applications, provides a reasonable time after its enactment for persons adversely affected to assert their rights prior to the time limitations contained in the article. Maltby v. Gauthier, 506 So.2d 1190 (La.1987). Accordingly, we find the article does not constitute an unconstitutional ex post facto application of law. See State v. Counterman, 611 So.2d 661 (La.App. 1 Cir.1992). Relator’s application was submitted well after the deadlines established by Article 930.8 and was, therefore, properly denied by the trial court as untimely.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Green, 616 So. 2d 1262, 1992 La. App. LEXIS 4353, 1992 WL 471501 (La. Ct. App. 1992).

616 So. 2d 1262 (State v. Green) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Smith v. City of New Orleans
616 So. 2d 1262 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)