State v. Green

Louisiana Court of Appeal

State v. Green

446 So. 2d 814, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8075

CourtLouisiana Court of Appeal

DecidedFebruary 21, 1984

DocketNo. 15807-KA

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 446 So. 2d 814 (State v. Green) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Louisiana Court of Appeal primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Green, 446 So. 2d 814, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8075 (La. Ct. App. 1984).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s assignments of error in this appeal for conviction of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute were neither briefed nor argued and are considered abandoned. State v. Domingue, 298 So.2d 723 (La.1974); State v. Williams, 338 So.2d 672 (La.1976). Our review is therefore confined to an examination of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable errors, errors patent. CCrP Art. 920(2); State v. Oliveaux, 312 So.2d 337 (La.1975).

An examination of this record, including the pleadings and proceedings, does not reveal any errors patent. The bill of information filed December 21, 1982, is in proper form. The trial court’s minutes indicate that the defendant was present with counsel at arraignment, at trial by jury, at the return of the judgment of the jury, and at sentencing. The jury was properly impaneled, was of the requisite number, and the verdict was unanimous.

The conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

Defendant’s assignments of error in this appeal for conviction of possession of marijuana with intent to distribute were neither briefed nor argued and are considered abandoned. State v. Domingue, 298 So.2d 723 (La.1974); State v. Williams, 338 So.2d 672 (La.1976). Our review is therefore confined to an examination of the pleadings and proceedings for discoverable errors, errors patent. CCrP Art. 920(2); State v. Oliveaux, 312 So.2d 337 (La.1975).

An examination of this record, including the pleadings and proceedings, does not reveal any errors patent. The bill of information filed December 21, 1982, is in proper form. The trial court’s minutes indicate that the defendant was present with counsel at arraignment, at trial by jury, at the return of the judgment of the jury, and at sentencing. The jury was properly impaneled, was of the requisite number, and the verdict was unanimous.

The conviction and sentence are AFFIRMED.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

446 So. 2d 814, 1984 La. App. LEXIS 8075, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-green-lactapp-1984.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack