State v. Gray
144 P.3d 1006, 208 Or. App. 327, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1455
Opinion
Appellant seeks reversal of an order continuing his involuntary commitment for mental illness. Appellant argues that the record does not establish by clear and convincing evidence that he suffers from a mental disorder or that, as a result of a mental disorder, he is presently a danger to others. The state concedes that the evidence is insufficient to establish that defendant is dangerous to others and that the judgment should be reversed. On de novo review of the record, we accept the state’s concession and reverse.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Gray, 144 P.3d 1006, 208 Or. App. 327, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 1455 (Or. Ct. App. 2006).
144 P.3d 1006 (State v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.