State v. Gray
This text of 136 P.3d 72 (State v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Court of Appeals of Oregon primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
Appellant in this mental commitment case appeals a judgment committing him to the Mental Health Division for treatment for a period of time not to exceed 180 days. ORS 426.130. The trial court found that appellant suffers from a mental disorder and is dangerous to others. A discussion of the facts would be of no benefit to the bench and bar. The state concedes that the record does not contain clear and convincing evidence that appellant is dangerous to others. We find the state’s concession to be well-founded and therefore accept it.
Reversed.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
136 P.3d 72, 206 Or. App. 233, 2006 Ore. App. LEXIS 732, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gray-orctapp-2006.