State v. Gray

1998 Ohio 321, 84 Ohio St. 3d 214

Ohio Supreme Court·Decided December 30, 1998·No. 1998-2159·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

The certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Ottawa County is accepted.

*215 The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s finding that Daniel Gray is a sexual predator is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., not participating.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

The certification of conflict by the Court of Appeals for Ottawa County is accepted.

*215 The judgment of the court of appeals is reversed on the authority of State v. Cook (1998), 83 Ohio St.3d 404, 700 N.E.2d 570.

The trial court’s finding that Daniel Gray is a sexual predator is reinstated.

Moyer, C.J., Douglas, F.E. Sweeney, Pfeifer, Cook and Lundberg Stratton, JJ., concur. Resnick, J., not participating.

State v. Gray, 1998 Ohio 321, 84 Ohio St. 3d 214 (Ohio 1998).

Pincite

1998 Ohio 321 (State v. Gray) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.