State v. Gray
This text of 330 S.W.3d 499 (State v. Gray) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
ORDER
The defendant, Arnold Gray, appeals the judgment of the Circuit Court of the City of St. Louis following his conviction by a jury of second-degree burglary, in violation of section 569.170 RSMo. (2000). The trial court sentenced the defendant as a prior and persistent offender to ten years’ imprisonment. Finding no error, we affirm.
An opinion would have no precedential value. The parties have been provided with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for this decision.
The trial court’s judgment is affirmed. Rule 30.25(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
330 S.W.3d 499, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 265, 2010 WL 785327, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gray-moctapp-2010.