Dickerson v. State
317 S.W.3d 99, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 605, 2010 WL 1860798
Opinion
ORDER
Bryan L. Dickerson appeals the judgment denying his Rule 29.15 motion for post-conviction relief after an evidentiary hearing. Dickerson argues he was denied his right to effective assistance of both trial and appellate counsel. We find the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the motion court is affirmed under Rule 84.16(b).
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Dickerson v. State, 317 S.W.3d 99, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 605, 2010 WL 1860798 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).
317 S.W.3d 99 (Dickerson v. State) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Gray
317 S.W.3d 99 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)