State v. Granier

600 So. 2d 1334, 1992 WL 162358
Supreme Court of Louisiana·Decided June 26, 1992·No. 92-K-0277·Published·Cited by 10 cases

Opinion

600 So.2d 1334 (1992)

STATE of Louisiana
v.
Shawn L. GRANIER.

No. 92-K-0277.

Supreme Court of Louisiana.

June 26, 1992.

Denied. The result is correct.

LEMMON, J., concurs. The judgment of the court of appeal, approving the admission of hearsay evidence of the informant's out-of-court assertion of defendant's criminal activity, cited State v. Wille, 559 So.2d 1321 (La.1990) for the exact opposite proposition to Wille's holding. An explanation of an officer's actions is almost never an acceptable basis for admitting an out-of-court declaration when the so-called explanation contains a direct assertion of criminal activity by the accused. State v. Hearold ___ So. ___ (La.1992) (No. 90-K-2094). The out-of-court statement, obviously offered to prove the truth of the matter asserted, should not have been admitted. Nevertheless, as in Wille, the error was harmless beyond a reasonable doubt.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Granier, 600 So. 2d 1334, 1992 WL 162358 (La. 1992).

600 So. 2d 1334 (State v. Granier) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Antoine
774 So. 2d 353 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 2000)
State v. Powell
746 So. 2d 825 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1999)
State v. McClain
685 So. 2d 590 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1996)
State v. Williams
660 So. 2d 919 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)
State v. Payne
657 So. 2d 531 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1995)
State v. Giles
639 So. 2d 323 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
State v. Dabney
633 So. 2d 1369 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
State v. Green
634 So. 2d 503 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1994)
State v. Caldwell
616 So. 2d 713 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1993)
State v. Holmes
607 So. 2d 956 (Louisiana Court of Appeal, 1992)