State v. Gordon

245 S.W.3d 266, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 211, 2008 WL 375619
Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided February 13, 2008·No. ED 89383·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Keith L. Gordon appeals the judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of attempt to manufacture a controlled substance and possession of drug paraphernalia with the intent to test a controlled substance. We find that the trial court did not err in overruling Gordon’s motion to suppress and in overruling Gordon’s objection to the admission of his statements to police at trial.

An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided the parties a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision. The judgment of the trial court is affirmed under Rule 80.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

State v. Gordon, 245 S.W.3d 266, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 211, 2008 WL 375619 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

245 S.W.3d 266 (State v. Gordon) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

Hayes v. State
245 S.W.3d 266 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2008)