Hayes v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Hayes v. State

245 S.W.3d 266, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 209, 2008 WL 375617

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedFebruary 13, 2008

DocketED 89486

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 245 S.W.3d 266 (Hayes v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Hayes v. State, 245 S.W.3d 266, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 209, 2008 WL 375617 (Mo. Ct. App. 2008).

Pincite

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie C. Hayes appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Willie C. Hayes appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 29.15 1 motion for post-conviction relief following an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the motion court’s findings and conclusions are not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2005, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

245 S.W.3d 266, 2008 Mo. App. LEXIS 209, 2008 WL 375617, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/hayes-v-state-moctapp-2008.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack