State v. Goodman
577 S.E.2d 619, 357 N.C. 43, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 315
Opinion
For the reasons stated in the dissenting opinion, the decision of the Court of Appeals is reversed. We hold that defendant’s petition for discretionary review as to additional issues was improvidently allowed.
REVERSED IN PART; DISCRETIONARY REVIEW IMPROVIDENTLY ALLOWED IN PART.
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Goodman, 577 S.E.2d 619, 357 N.C. 43, 2003 N.C. LEXIS 315 (N.C. 2003).
577 S.E.2d 619 (State v. Goodman) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Scott
Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2020
State v. Davis
702 S.E.2d 507 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
State v. Boyd
701 S.E.2d 255 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2010)
State v. Maready
669 S.E.2d 564 (Supreme Court of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. McCall
664 S.E.2d 77 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Toler
657 S.E.2d 446 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Maready
654 S.E.2d 769 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2008)
State v. Westbrook
623 S.E.2d 73 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Edwards
612 S.E.2d 394 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Silas
609 S.E.2d 400 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2005)
State v. Jeffery
605 S.E.2d 672 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
State v. Blackwell
603 S.E.2d 168 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2004)
Jeffries v. State
90 P.3d 185 (Court of Appeals of Alaska, 2004)
State v. Miller
583 S.E.2d 620 (Court of Appeals of North Carolina, 2003)