State v. Goodall

160 P. 595, 82 Or. 329, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 115
CourtOregon Supreme Court
DecidedNovember 28, 1916
StatusPublished
Cited by12 cases

This text of 160 P. 595 (State v. Goodall) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Oregon Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Goodall, 160 P. 595, 82 Or. 329, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 115 (Or. 1916).

Opinions

Mr. Justice Benson

delivered the opinion of the court.

1. The jurisdiction of a justice of the peace to try criminal cases is limited by Sections 2411 and 2412, L. O. L., to the crimes enumerated in the former and the maximum penalties named in the latter. Cruelty to animals is not included in the sections mentioned in [331]*331Section 2411, and the maximum penalties named in Section 2103 exceed the limit prescribed in Section 2412. The power of the justice in this case was confined to conducting a preliminary examination with a view to a subsequent investigation of the charge by a grand jury. The only jurisdiction ácquired by the Circuit Court was simply that of an appellate tribunal. In Evcms v. Christian, 4 Or. 375, this court says:

“If the court below had no jurisdiction to proceed, this court, which possesses only appellate jurisdiction, could acquire none by the appeal. And when a question of jurisdiction presents itself in any stage of a proceeding, and it is discovered that the court has no jurisdiction, either over the parties or the subject matter of the cause, it is the duty of the court on its own motion to refuse to proceed further. Any attempt to exercise judicial functions otherwise than as authorized by law would be a nullity and an idle waste of time.”

Nor can the lack of jurisdiction of the subject matter be waived: 12 Cyc. 228. It follows that the judgment of the lower court must be reversed and the cause dismissed, and it is so ordered.

Reversed. Affirmed on Rehearing.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Keys
489 P.3d 83 (Oregon Supreme Court, 2021)
State v. Cervantes
223 P.3d 425 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 2009)
State v. Dolan
595 P.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1979)
State v. Nussbaum
491 P.2d 1013 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1971)
Lilly v. Gladden
348 P.2d 1 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1959)
State v. Smith
188 P.2d 998 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1948)
State v. Du Bois
153 P.2d 521 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1944)
Lamm v. Silver Falls Timber Co.
291 P. 375 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1929)
State v. Miller
243 P. 72 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1926)
Dippold v. Cathlamet Timber Co.
193 P. 909 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1920)
State v. Goodall
160 P. 595 (Oregon Supreme Court, 1916)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
160 P. 595, 82 Or. 329, 1916 Ore. LEXIS 115, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-goodall-or-1916.