State v. Glover

641 S.E.2d 543, 281 Ga. 633, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 488, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 189
CourtSupreme Court of Georgia
DecidedFebruary 26, 2007
DocketS06A1550
StatusPublished
Cited by18 cases

This text of 641 S.E.2d 543 (State v. Glover) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Georgia primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Glover, 641 S.E.2d 543, 281 Ga. 633, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 488, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 189 (Ga. 2007).

Opinions

Sears, Chief Justice.

On November 9, 2005, the trial court, relying on OCGA § 5-6-48 (c),1 dismissed the State’s appeal of a February 2001 ruling that barred the trial of the appellee, Maurice Glover, on the ground that his constitutional right to a speedy trial had been violated.2 The State appeals from the order dismissing its appeal. We conclude, however, that an order dismissing an appeal is not an order that the State has a right to appeal under OCGA § 5-7-1. Although the State has a right to appeal from void orders, OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (5), the order dismissing the State’s appeal, even if erroneous, is not void. A judgment “is not void so long as it was entered by a court of competent jurisdiction.”3 For example, in Collins, this Court addressed an order of a trial court modifying a divorce judgment in a contempt proceeding. We held that, although the trial court did not have the authority to modify the divorce judgment in the contempt proceeding, the judgment was not void, but was erroneous, as it was entered by a court having competent jurisdiction to hear the dispute.4 In the present case, the dissent states that the trial court erroneously applied OCGA § 5-6-48 (c). Even assuming the trial court erred., however, the order is not void as it was entered by a court of competent jurisdiction.

Because the State does not have a right to appeal under OCGA § 5-7-1 (a) (5) or under any other provision of OCGA § 5-7-1, the State’s appeal is hereby dismissed.5

Appeal dismissed.

All the Justices concur, except Carley and Melton, JJ., who dissent.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

State v. Jerry Campbell
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2025
State v. Robert Laguan Scott
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2023
In the Interest of A. H., a Child
891 S.E.2d 785 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2023)
Albert Howard v. State
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2022
State v. Dennis Patrick Monday
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
State v. Melanie Pickens
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2014
State v. Dena King
Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013
State v. King
750 S.E.2d 756 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Carrier411 Services, Inc. v. Insight Technology, Inc.
744 S.E.2d 356 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2013)
Bank of America, N.A. v. Johnson (In re Johnson)
479 B.R. 159 (N.D. Georgia, 2012)
In the Interest of D. L.
690 S.E.2d 522 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
In Re DL
690 S.E.2d 522 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2010)
State v. Yapo
674 S.E.2d 44 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2009)
Johnson v. State
652 S.E.2d 836 (Court of Appeals of Georgia, 2007)
State v. Evans
646 S.E.2d 77 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)
State v. Glover
641 S.E.2d 543 (Supreme Court of Georgia, 2007)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
641 S.E.2d 543, 281 Ga. 633, 2007 Fulton County D. Rep. 488, 2007 Ga. LEXIS 189, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-glover-ga-2007.