State v. Glass

Missouri Court of Appeals

State v. Glass

179 S.W.3d 468, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1892, 2005 WL 3466069

Missouri Court of Appeals·Decided December 20, 2005·No. ED 84937·Published

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Raymond Glass (“Defendant”), appeals- from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of felony stealing, section 570.030.8, RSMo 2000 (amended 2002). Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years of imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Appellant, Raymond Glass (“Defendant”), appeals- from the judgment of the Circuit Court of St. Charles County, entered after a jury trial, finding him guilty of felony stealing, section 570.030.8, RSMo 2000 (amended 2002). Defendant was sentenced as a prior and persistent offender to fifteen years of imprisonment. We affirm.

We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal. As an extended opinion would serve no jurisprudential purpose, we affirm the judgment pursuant to Rule 30.25(b). We have, however, provided a memorandum opinion for the use of the parties only setting forth the reasons for our decision.

State v. Glass, 179 S.W.3d 468, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1892, 2005 WL 3466069 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

179 S.W.3d 468 (State v. Glass) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related