Laura v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Laura v. State

179 S.W.3d 468, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1867, 2005 WL 3466103

CourtMissouri Court of Appeals

DecidedDecember 20, 2005

DocketED 85719

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 179 S.W.3d 468 (Laura v. State) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

Laura v. State, 179 S.W.3d 468, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1867, 2005 WL 3466103 (Mo. Ct. App. 2005).

Pincite

Opinion

*469 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Laura (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment and sentence without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err. Jones v. State, 24 S.W.3d 701, 703 (Mo.App. E.D. 1999). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

*469 ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Andrew Laura (Appellant) appeals from the motion court’s judgment denying his Rule 24.035 1 amended motion to vacate, set aside, or correct judgment and sentence without an evidentiary hearing. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the motion court did not clearly err. Jones v. State, 24 S.W.3d 701, 703 (Mo.App. E.D. 1999). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

1

. All rule references are to Mo. R.Crim. P.2004, unless otherwise indicated.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

179 S.W.3d 468, 2005 Mo. App. LEXIS 1867, 2005 WL 3466103, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/laura-v-state-moctapp-2005.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack