State v. G.L.
This text of 2012 Ohio 6089 (State v. G.L.) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Ohio Supreme Court primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.
Opinion
[Cite as State v. G.L., 135 Ohio St.3d 136, 2012-Ohio-6089.]
THE STATE OF OHIO, APPELLEE, v. G.L., APPELLANT. [Cite as State v. G.L., 135 Ohio St.3d 136, 2012-Ohio-6089.] Court of appeals’ judgment affirmed on the authority of In re M.W. (No. 2011-1092—Submitted December 21, 2012—Decided December 26, 2012.) APPEAL from the Court of Appeals for Montgomery County, No. 24118. __________________ {¶ 1} The judgment of the court of appeals is affirmed on the authority of In re M.W., 133 Ohio St.3d 309, 2012-Ohio-4538, 978 N.E.2d 164. O’CONNOR, C.J., and LUNDBERG STRATTON, O’DONNELL, LANZINGER, and CUPP, JJ., concur. PFEIFER, J., dissents. KENNEDY, J., not participating. __________________ Mathias H. Heck Jr., Montgomery County Prosecuting Attorney, and Laura M. Woodruff, Assistant Prosecuting Attorney, for appellee. Timothy Young, Ohio Public Defender, and Amanda Powell, Assistant Public Defender, for appellant. ______________________
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
Related
Cite This Page — Counsel Stack
2012 Ohio 6089, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gl-ohio-2012.