State v. Ginsberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Ginsberg

256 N.W. 828, 192 Minn. 241

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedJune 29, 1934

DocketNo. 30,026.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 256 N.W. 828 (State v. Ginsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

State v. Ginsberg, 256 N.W. 828, 192 Minn. 241 (Mich. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion ease to State v. Smith, 192 Minn. 237, 255 N. W. 826. The defendant here is the Ginsberg referred to in that opinion. The evidence in this case is substantially the same as in the Smith case except that Ginsberg did not testify and that he took a more active part in the offense than did Smith. The same questions are raised by this appeal that were raised by Smith. The same result must follow. The judgment appéaled from is affirmed, and the sentence imposed by the trial court is directed to be executed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion ease to State v. Smith, 192 Minn. 237, 255 N. W. 826. The defendant here is the Ginsberg referred to in that opinion. The evidence in this case is substantially the same as in the Smith case except that Ginsberg did not testify and that he took a more active part in the offense than did Smith. The same questions are raised by this appeal that were raised by Smith. The same result must follow. The judgment appéaled from is affirmed, and the sentence imposed by the trial court is directed to be executed.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

256 N.W. 828, 192 Minn. 241, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-ginsberg-minn-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack