State v. Ginsberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

State v. Ginsberg

256 N.W. 828, 192 Minn. 241

Supreme Court of Minnesota·Decided June 29, 1934·No. No. 30,026.·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion ease to State v. Smith, 192 Minn. 237, 255 N. W. 826. The defendant here is the Ginsberg referred to in that opinion. The evidence in this case is substantially the same as in the Smith case except that Ginsberg did not testify and that he took a more active part in the offense than did Smith. The same questions are raised by this appeal that were raised by Smith. The same result must follow. The judgment appéaled from is affirmed, and the sentence imposed by the trial court is directed to be executed.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

This is a companion ease to State v. Smith, 192 Minn. 237, 255 N. W. 826. The defendant here is the Ginsberg referred to in that opinion. The evidence in this case is substantially the same as in the Smith case except that Ginsberg did not testify and that he took a more active part in the offense than did Smith. The same questions are raised by this appeal that were raised by Smith. The same result must follow. The judgment appéaled from is affirmed, and the sentence imposed by the trial court is directed to be executed.

State v. Ginsberg, 256 N.W. 828, 192 Minn. 241 (Mich. 1934).

Pincite

256 N.W. 828 (State v. Ginsberg) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Opinion

Related