In Re Disbarment of Abe S. Ginsberg

Supreme Court of Minnesota

In Re Disbarment of Abe S. Ginsberg

257 N.W. 337, 192 Minn. 547, 1934 Minn. LEXIS 950

CourtSupreme Court of Minnesota

DecidedNovember 23, 1934

DocketNo. 29,446.

StatusPublished

Cited by1 cases

This text of 257 N.W. 337 (In Re Disbarment of Abe S. Ginsberg) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of Minnesota primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook

In Re Disbarment of Abe S. Ginsberg, 257 N.W. 337, 192 Minn. 547, 1934 Minn. LEXIS 950 (Mich. 1934).

Pincite

Opinion

PER CURIAM.

It is enough to compel judgment of disbarment that the accused has been convicted of a felony — attempted grand larceny. He ap *548 pealed from the judgment, which was affirmed here. State v. Ginsberg, 192 Minn. 241, 255 N. W. 828. In addition to the foregoing, it is not amiss to say that Mr. Ginsberg has been found guilty upon two other charges, his guilt of either of which would demonstrate-his utter unfitness to remain a member of the legal profession. This is not the first time he has been before us for discipline. He was admitted to the bar in 1911. In 1918 he was suspended from the practice of law with the privilege of applying for a removal of the suspension, upon a proper showing at the expiration of one year. In re Removal of Ginsberg, 141 Minn. 271, 169 N. W. 787. The record now before us shows that the indulgence granted him when we lifted the suspension ivas ill deserved.

Let judgment of disbarment be entered forthwith.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

PER CURIAM.

It is enough to compel judgment of disbarment that the accused has been convicted of a felony — attempted grand larceny. He ap *548 pealed from the judgment, which was affirmed here. State v. Ginsberg, 192 Minn. 241, 255 N. W. 828. In addition to the foregoing, it is not amiss to say that Mr. Ginsberg has been found guilty upon two other charges, his guilt of either of which would demonstrate-his utter unfitness to remain a member of the legal profession. This is not the first time he has been before us for discipline. He was admitted to the bar in 1911. In 1918 he was suspended from the practice of law with the privilege of applying for a removal of the suspension, upon a proper showing at the expiration of one year. In re Removal of Ginsberg, 141 Minn. 271, 169 N. W. 787. The record now before us shows that the indulgence granted him when we lifted the suspension ivas ill deserved.

Let judgment of disbarment be entered forthwith.

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)

257 N.W. 337, 192 Minn. 547, 1934 Minn. LEXIS 950, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/in-re-disbarment-of-abe-s-ginsberg-minn-1934.

Opinion

Related

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack