State v. Giles

128 A. 335, 81 N.H. 418, 1925 N.H. LEXIS 32
CourtSupreme Court of New Hampshire
DecidedJanuary 6, 1925
StatusPublished

This text of 128 A. 335 (State v. Giles) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Supreme Court of New Hampshire primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Giles, 128 A. 335, 81 N.H. 418, 1925 N.H. LEXIS 32 (N.H. 1925).

Opinion

Snow, J.

The rules of civil proceedings are applicable to complaints under P. S., c. 87. Marston v. Jenness, 11 N. H. 156, 161; Little v. Dickinson, 29 N. H. 56, 61; Stokes v. Sanborn, 45 N. H. 274, 276; Richmond v. Bowen, 54 N. H. 99, 101; Ford v. Smith, 62 N. H. 419.

“Either party may appeal from the judgment of a justice, in a civil cause, to the next trial term of the supreme [superior] court.” “No such appeal shall be allowed unless claimed within two hours after the judgment is rendered, nor unless the party appealing, within twenty-four hours, enters into recognizance, or files with the justice a bond to the adverse party, with sufficient sureties, in the sum of one hundred dollars, to pay the costs which may be recovered against him.” P. S., c. 210, ss. 7, 8. This statute is conclusive of the complainant’s rights. As she failed to enter into a recognizance, or file a bond, the municipal court had no power to grant her appeal. Gilman v. Bartlett, 20 N. H. 168; Farnam v. Davis, 32 N. H. 302, 309; Dickey v. Livermore, 34 N. H. 199, 201; State v. White, 41 N. H. 194, 196. “An appeal from a subordinate tribunal’s determination of fact is unknown to the common law. It exists only by statute. . . . The court cannot allow an appeal where none is provided, nor can it dispense with any of the prescribed conditions of an appeal that is provided. When the legislature declares that before an appeal is granted the appellant shall enter into a recognizance, the court cannot say that it shall be granted without a recognizance.” State v. Gerry, 68 N. H. 495, 502.

Exception overruled.

All concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

Ford v. Smith
62 N.H. 419 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1882)
State v. Gerry
38 A. 272 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1896)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
128 A. 335, 81 N.H. 418, 1925 N.H. LEXIS 32, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-giles-nh-1925.