Ford v. Smith

62 N.H. 419
Supreme Court of New Hampshire·Decided December 5, 1882·Published·Cited by 1 cases

Opinion

Carpenter, J.

The complaint is a civil suit, and any amendment may be made which is necessary to prevent injustice. G. L., c. 226, ss. 8, 9; Laws 1879, c. 7; Marston v. Jenness, 11 N. H. 156, 160; Little v. Dickinson, 29 N. H. 56, 60; Stebhins v. Lancashire Ins. Co., 59 N. H. 143. The question whether the complaint is defective by reason of the allegation that the child was begotten in another jurisdiction is not considered. The motion to dismiss is denied.

Amendment allowed.

Stanley, J., did not sit: the others concurred.

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Ford v. Smith, 62 N.H. 419 (N.H. 1882).

62 N.H. 419 (Ford v. Smith) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.

Related

State v. Giles
128 A. 335 (Supreme Court of New Hampshire, 1925)