State v. Garcias
661 P.2d 123, 62 Or. App. 472, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2768
Court of Appeals of Oregon·Decided April 6, 1983·No. B63,876; CA A26238; B64-116; A26283; B64-116; A26284; B64-110; A26285; B63-873; A26286; B63-949; A26387·Published·Cited by 1 cases
Opinion
In these criminal cases, consolidated for the purpose of appeal, the state appeals rulings by various judges of the Lane County District Court that the menacing statute, ORS 163.190,1 is unconstitutional. This court has recently held to the contrary in State v. Anderson, 56 Or App 12, 641 P2d 40 (1982), but the judges were apparently convinced that our opinion in Anderson was overruled sub silentio in State v. Robertson, 293 Or 402, 649 P2d 569 (1982). We disagree.
Reversed and remanded for trial.
Footnotes
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Garcias, 661 P.2d 123, 62 Or. App. 472, 1983 Ore. App. LEXIS 2768 (Or. Ct. App. 1983).
661 P.2d 123 (State v. Garcias) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.
Related
State v. Garcias
661 P.2d 123 (Court of Appeals of Oregon, 1983)