State v. Garcia
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Appellate Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellant,
4 v. NO. 34,485
5 ERIC GARCIA,
6 Defendant-Appellee.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF BERNALILLO COUNTY 8 Jacqueline D. Flores, District Judge
9 Hector H. Balderas, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM 11 Jane A. Bernstein, Assistant Attorney General 12 Albuquerque, NM
13 for Appellant
14 M. Naomi Salazar 15 Albuquerque, NM
16 for Appellee
17 MEMORANDUM OPINION
18 GARCIA, Judge. 1 {1} Plaintiff State of New Mexico filed a docketing statement, appealing from the
2 district court’s order granting Defendant Eric Garcia’s motion to exclude drug test
3 results, entered on January 30, 2015. [DS 2–3; RP 33] This Court issued a calendar
4 notice, proposing to affirm. The State filed a response to our notice, informing this
5 Court that it “will not be filing a memorandum in opposition to the proposed summary
6 affirmance[.]” [Response 1] Accordingly, for the reasons stated in our notice of
7 proposed disposition, we affirm.
8 {2} IT IS SO ORDERED.
9 ________________________________ 10 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
11 WE CONCUR:
12 _______________________________ 13 RODERICK T. KENNEDY, Judge
14 _______________________________ 15 LINDA M. VANZI, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Garcia (State v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.