State v. Garcia
Opinion
This memorandum opinion was not selected for publication in the New Mexico Reports. Please see Rule 12-405 NMRA for restrictions on the citation of unpublished memorandum opinions. Please also note that this electronic memorandum opinion may contain computer-generated errors or other deviations from the official paper version filed by the Court of Appeals and does not include the filing date.
1 IN THE COURT OF APPEALS OF THE STATE OF NEW MEXICO
2 STATE OF NEW MEXICO,
3 Plaintiff-Appellee,
4 vs. NO. 31,695
5 JOSE GARCIA,
6 Defendant-Appellant.
7 APPEAL FROM THE DISTRICT COURT OF SAN JUAN COUNTY 8 William C. Birdsall, District Judge
9 Gary K. King, Attorney General 10 Santa Fe, NM
11 for Appellee
12 The Rio Law Firm 13 Francis J. Rio, III 14 Albuquerque, NM
15 for Appellant 1 MEMORANDUM OPINION
2 GARCIA, Judge.
3 Summary affirmance was proposed for the reason stated in the notice of
4 proposed disposition. No memorandum opposing summary affirmance has been filed,
5 and the time for doing so has expired.
6 Affirmed.
7 IT IS SO ORDERED.
8 9 TIMOTHY L. GARCIA, Judge
10 WE CONCUR:
11 12 MICHAEL D. BUSTAMANTE, Judge
13 14 JONATHAN B. SUTIN, Judge
Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI
State v. Garcia (State v. Garcia) — published by Counsel Stack Legal Research, free access to 12M+ legal documents.