State v. Gamble

313 S.W.3d 709, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2010 WL 2378938
CourtMissouri Court of Appeals
DecidedJune 15, 2010
DocketED 93540
StatusPublished
Cited by1 cases

This text of 313 S.W.3d 709 (State v. Gamble) is published on Counsel Stack Legal Research, covering Missouri Court of Appeals primary law. Counsel Stack provides free access to over 12 million legal documents including statutes, case law, regulations, and constitutions.

Bluebook
State v. Gamble, 313 S.W.3d 709, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2010 WL 2378938 (Mo. Ct. App. 2010).

Opinion

ORDER

PER CURIAM.

Robert Gamble appeals from the trial court’s judgment entered upon a jury verdict convicting him of second-degree murder and armed criminal action. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude that the trial court did not abuse its discretion in controlling voir dire. State v. Johnson, 207 S.W.3d 24, 40 (Mo. banc 2006). An extended opinion would have no prece-dential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Criminal Procedure 30.25(b).

Free access — add to your briefcase to read the full text and ask questions with AI

Related

McDaniel v. State
313 S.W.3d 709 (Missouri Court of Appeals, 2010)

Cite This Page — Counsel Stack

Bluebook (online)
313 S.W.3d 709, 2010 Mo. App. LEXIS 798, 2010 WL 2378938, Counsel Stack Legal Research, https://law.counselstack.com/opinion/state-v-gamble-moctapp-2010.